高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of lecture-based learning with presentation-assimilation-discussion method in occupational bloodborne exposure education of nursing students, a randomised trial

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sch Med, Inst Cardiovasc Dis,Dept Cardiol, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China [2]Chengdu Med Coll, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Surg, Chengdu 610044, Peoples R China [3]Chengdu Med Coll, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Chengdu 610021, Peoples R China [4]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sichuan Acad Med Sci, Dept Fever Clin, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China [5]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Nephrol,Inst Nephrol, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Occupational bloodborne exposures PAD model Lecture-based learning Nursing student

摘要:
Background Occupational Bloodborne Exposures (OBEs) are incidents where healthcare workers come into contact with blood or other potentially infectious materials, leading to risks of transmitting bloodborne pathogens. Nursing students, often in direct contact with patients, face heightened risks due to their duties. Methods First, we conducted a cross-sectional survey using a OBEs questionnaire to explore the knowledge, attitudes, practices, and needs regarding OBEs among nursing students. Subsequently, we used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the impact of the Presentation-Assimilation-Discussion (PAD) method with the traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) method on OBEs education for nursing students. Pre-test, post-test, and retention test were used to observe the teaching effectiveness, and the students' feedback on the teaching method was also observed. Results In the cross-sectional survey, we found that nursing students lacked sufficient knowledge and management skills regarding OBEs but recognized the importance of standard precautions and expressed a desire for systematic OBEs training during their education and internships. In the RCT, the total, theoretical, and practical scores of the PAD and LBL groups were comparable in the pre-test (56.70 +/- 3.47 vs. 56.40 +/- 3.95, 33.09 +/- 3.39 vs. 33.33 +/- 2.44, 23.61 +/- 4.66 vs. 23.07 +/- 4.84, p > 0.05). After training, the PAD model demonstrated an advantage over the LBL model in immediate total (84.25 +/- 4.06 vs. 78.95 +/- 4.23, p < 0.001), theoretical (54.32 +/- 2.43 vs. 51.44 +/- 2.58, p < 0.001), and practical scores (29.93 +/- 3.90 vs. 27.51 +/- 4.33, p < 0.01). It also showed superior retention of total (69.05 +/- 3.87 vs. 65.77 +/- 2.94, p < 0.001) and theoretical scores (39.05 +/- 3.05 vs. 36.23 +/- 3.18, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the retention of practical scores between the two groups (30.00 +/- 4.76 vs. 29.53 +/- 3.73, p > 0.05). The PAD group benefited more across various learning dimensions but reported a higher study load. Conclusions Our study reveals that the PAD model could be a valuable approach for teaching OBEs to nursing students.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 护理
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 护理
JCR分区:
出版当年[2023]版:
Q1 NURSING
最新[2023]版:
Q1 NURSING

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2023版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Sch Med, Inst Cardiovasc Dis,Dept Cardiol, Chengdu 610072, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:46676 今日访问量:3 总访问量:3332 更新日期:2024-11-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号