高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Team-based learning vs. lecture-based learning in nursing: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Postgraduate Students, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. [2]Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. [3]Department of Oncology and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. [4]Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, Institute of Respiratory Health, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
出处:

关键词: nursing team-based learning lecture-based learning education e􀀀ectiveness

摘要:
Our study aims to identify, appraise, and summarize randomized controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of team-based learning (TBL) versus lecture-based learning (LBL) in nursing students.We searched PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang databases from inception to 22nd July 2022 to enroll RCTs that compared TBL versus LBL. The studies reporting the performance of nursing students receiving TBL pedagogy compared to those receiving traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) were to be analyzed. Scores of academic or nursing abilities were considered the primary outcome, and the results of nursing competencies, students' engagement with, behaviors, attitudes toward, experience, satisfaction, or perceptions of TBL were considered the secondary outcome. This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Reviewer's Handbook and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement.A total of 1,009 participants in 10 RCTs were enrolled in this study. Of the 10 RCTs, eight studies investigated undergraduate students, one involved vocational college students, and one enrolled secondary school students. The most reported outcomes were class engagement survey toward TBL (n = 8); students' ability (n = 5), academic knowledge or performance (n = 4); students' experience (n = 4), satisfaction or perceptions of TBL (n = 4).This review suggested that the TBL was an effective pedagogy in improving academic performance and general ability in nursing students. High-quality trials are needed, and standardized outcomes should be used.Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Tang, Zhao and Wang.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Postgraduate Students, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43389 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号