高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Determining the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in treating nephrolithiasis in patients with solitary kidneys

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Nanchong Central Hospital, Department of Urology, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China. [2]Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, LanzhouGansu, 730000, China. [3]Institute of Urology, Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China. [4]South China Hospital, Health Science Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China. [5]Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, 215006, China. [6]Institute of Urology, Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. hxcaodehong@163.com. [7]State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Solitary kidney ・ Renal calculus ・ Percutaneous nephrolithotomy ・ Retrograde intrarenal surgery ・Nephrolithiasis

摘要:
We performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treating nephrolithiasis ≥ 2 cm in patients with solitary kidneys. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42021270519). The search time was set from the establishment of the databases until April 30, 2021. A systematic search was performed in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. Stata 16 was used to perform the statistical analysis of the extracted data. After screening using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, five studies with a total of 474 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. According to the literature quality assessment scale statistics, the five studies included were of high quality. The results of the meta-analysis showed that RIRS had lesser hemoglobin loss (HL), shorter length of hospital stay (LOS), lower initial (OR = 3.39, 95% CI [1.97, 5.83], P = 0.02) and final stone-free rates (OR = 2.24, 95% CI [1.24, 4.06], P = 0.03), but a higher incidence of grade III-IV complications (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.08, 0.97], P = 0.04) than PCNL. The difference between the two surgical methods was not statistically significant in terms of operation time (OT), grade I–II complication rate, and total complication rate. For nephrolithiasis ≥ 2 cm in patients with a solitary kidney, RIRS has the advantage of less HL and shorter LOS, while PCNL benefits from its higher SFR (both initial and final). Both RIRS and PCNL are effective treatments for nephrolithiasis in patients with a solitary kidney, and clinicians should choose the most appropriate option to achieve the best treatment outcome, taking into account the patient's underlying conditions and medical conditions.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
最新[2023]版:
Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2022版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2021版] 出版后一年[2023版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Nanchong Central Hospital, Department of Urology, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, China. [2]Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, LanzhouGansu, 730000, China. [3]Institute of Urology, Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China. [4]South China Hospital, Health Science Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [6]Institute of Urology, Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. hxcaodehong@163.com. [7]State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43370 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号