机构:[1]Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China,四川省肿瘤医院[2]Department of Geriatrics, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China.四川大学华西医院
It remains to be seen whether S-1 can be a replacement for infusional fluorouracil (5-FU) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of S-1 with 5-FU in AGC. PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched. Randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses comparing S-1 with 5-FU for AGC were eligible. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2. Seven trials involving 2443 patients were included. Compared with 5-FU, S-1 showed no significant prolongation of overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR] =0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.83-1.01], P=0.07) and progression-free survival (HR =0.89, 95% CI [0.70-1.13], P=0.35), but longer time to treatment failure (HR=0.74, 95% CI [0.56-0.97], P=0.03). The objective response rates were comparable (risk ratio [RR] =1.36, 95% CI [0.95, 1.96], P=0.10). Regarding treatment-related deaths and hematological toxicities, there was significant heterogeneity between Asian and non-Asian trials, and subgroup analysis was applied. In Asian patients, there was a significant increase in hematological toxicities such as leukopenia (grade 1-4: RR =1.22, 95% CI [1.08, 1.37], P=0.001; grade 3-4: RR =2.21, 95% CI [1.52, 3.21], P<0.0001), neutropenia (grade 1-4: RR =1.29, 95% CI [1.11, 1.48], P=0.0005; grade 3-4: RR =1.87, 95% CI [1.11, 3.17], P=0.02), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1-4: RR =1.71, 95% CI [1.22, 2.41], P=0.002) in S-1-containing regimens compared with 5-FU-containing regimens, but without significant difference in treatment-related mortality rate (risk difference [RD] =0.00, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.01], P=0.68). In non-Asian patients, S-1-containing regimens were, however, associated with significantly fewer treatment-related deaths (RD = -0.02, 95% CI [-0.05, -0.00], P=0.04), as well as less all grade 1-4 and grade 3-4 hematological toxicities except anemia. There was no significant heterogeneity in nonhematologic toxicities between Asian and non-Asian trials. Lower incidence of grade 1-4 nausea, diarrhea, mucositis, grade 3-4 mucositis, increased creatinine, and decreased calculated creatinine clearance was observed in S-1-containing regimens. S-1 could not improve OS, but increase some hematological toxicities in Asian patients. Therefore, special attention on hematological toxicities should be paid to Asian patients because S-1 is administered on an outpatient basis.
基金:
Health and Family Planning Commission of Sichuan Province [130226]; Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Project [2014FZ0089]
第一作者机构:[1]Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China,
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, PR China,[*1]Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, No. 55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, PR China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Chen Xiao-Dong,He Fu-Qian,Chen Mi,et al.Can S-1 replace fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer? A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis[J].MEDICINE.2016,95(24):doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000003916.
APA:
Chen, Xiao-Dong,He, Fu-Qian,Chen, Mi,Tang, Ling-Chao&Tang, Xiao-Li.(2016).Can S-1 replace fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer? A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.MEDICINE,95,(24)
MLA:
Chen, Xiao-Dong,et al."Can S-1 replace fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer? A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis".MEDICINE 95..24(2016)