高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in detecting and diagnosing colorectal tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]School of Intergrative Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China [2]School of Acu‑Mox and Tuina, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [3]Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200437, China [4]Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China [5]Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang 712000, China [6]Medical and Health Materials Research Institute, Sinopec (Beijing) Chemical Research Institute Co., LTD, Beijing 100000, China [7]State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Molecular Recognition and Biosensing, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China [8]Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center The First Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin 300121, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Artificial intelligence Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection rate Diagnosis rate Systematic review Mesh meta-analysis

摘要:
The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has greatly promoted the development of the field of medical image analysis, but the potential benefits of AI-assisted colonoscopy and diagnosis (CADe/CADx) for the detection rate of colorectal adenomas and the histological diagnosis of polyps are still controversial and unknown.We conducted a search on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, and the last search time was August 2024. We collected adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSL). Paired analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed using R Studio. StataSE15.0 software was used for statistical analysis to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of CADx and conventional colonoscopy.We included a total of 64 studies, including 52 RCT studies and 12 clinical studies, with a total of 50,834 patients undergoing colonoscopy. The results showed that different adjuvant interventions had significant differences in the detection rate of adenoma compared with routine colonoscopy ADR [RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.14, 1.26), P < 0.001], and the results were statistically significant. Among different CADe models and advanced optical imaging techniques, ENDOANGEL model-assisted colonoscopy is the most effective method for detecting colorectal adenomas and polyps (97.8%), and Endocuff-AI model-assisted colonoscopy is the most effective method for detecting sessile serrated lesions (94.4%). In the performance study of endoscopists with or without CADX-assisted diagnosis, the optical diagnostic sensitivity of colorectal adenomas was (88% VS 86%), specificity (78% VS 77%), and AUC area (91% VS 89%), and the study results showed no significant differences.ENDOANGEL model-assisted colonoscopy shows the best efficacy on both ADR and PDR, Endocuff-AI model-assisted colonoscopy shows the best performance on SSL, and compared with optical evaluation without CADx, real-time polyp assessment using CADx did not significantly increase the diagnostic sensitivity of neoplastic polyps during colonoscopy.© 2025. The Author(s).

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科 4 区 胃肠肝病学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 外科 4 区 胃肠肝病学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]School of Intergrative Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:65780 今日访问量:3 总访问量:5151 更新日期:2025-12-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号