高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Real-world first-line serplulimab therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: effectiveness, safety, and clinical implications

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. [2]Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. [3]Department of Medical Oncology, Taizhou People's Hospital, Taizhou, China. [4]Department of Medical Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Chengdu, China. [5]Department of Medical Oncology, Subei People's Hospital of Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: esophageal cancer advanced cancer serplulimab treatment efficacy safety realworld evidence

摘要:
The phase III ASTRUM-007 trial demonstrated significant clinical benefit in patients with PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy. This multicenter, observational cohort study aimed to evaluate the real-world outcomes, and address evidence gaps in broader patient populations.This multicenter real-world cohort study collected the data of patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer who received first-line serplulimab treatment, regardless of histologic type and PD-L1 expression. The outcomes included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety.Among 104 included patients, the median number of serplulimab treatment cycles was four; 10 patients (9.6%) concurrently received targeted therapy, 21 (20.2%) received radiotherapy, and 97 received chemotherapy (93.3%). The confirmed ORR was 40.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.8-50.9%) and the DCR was 97.8% (95% CI: 92.2-99.7%). With a median follow-up time of 6.8 months, the median rwPFS was 12.00 months (95% CI: 8.87-not reached [NR]). The median OS was not reached (95% CI: 13.27-NR), with a 1-year OS rate of 73.5% (95% CI: 60.4-89.3%). Subgroup analysis showed prolonged median PFS in patients aged ≥65 years than those <65 years (12.00 vs. 6.87 months, p = 0.022). Only two serious adverse events were reported (one hyperkalemia and one decreased white blood cell count).This real-world study supports the effectiveness and safety of serplulimab-based regimens as a first-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, regardless of their diverse characteristics.Copyright © 2025 Yan, Zhu, Wu, Ren, Yu, Sun, Liu, Sun and Sun.

语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 医学:内科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
最新[2024]版:
Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Medical Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital & Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research & The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal cancer: real-world multicenter retrospective study in China. [2]Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study [3]Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Intrathoracic Perfusion Chemotherapy Combined with immunological factor Interleukin-2 in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study [4]Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment in Chinese patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. [5]Involvement in treatment decision-making and self-reported efficacy among patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a nationwide multi-center cross-sectional study [6]Efficacy and safety of surufatinib plus toripalimab, a chemotherapy-free regimen, in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, or biliary tract cancer [7]阿法替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床疗效和安全性的Meta分析 [8]Efficacy and safety of cisplatin-based versus nedaplatin-based regimens for the treatment of metastatic/recurrent and advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis [9]阿法替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床疗效和安全性的Meta分析 [10]Drug treatment options of high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer based on efficacy and safety: a systematic review and Bayesian network analysis

资源点击量:65764 今日访问量:2 总访问量:5150 更新日期:2025-12-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号