高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Genetic association of MIR-449B, GCLC, eNOS, SORD, and ENPP1 with diabetic retinopathy

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]The Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Disease Gene Study, Center for Medical Genetics, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Research Unit for Blindness Prevention of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU026), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, China [3]Center for Natural Products Research, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China [4]The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China [5]Department of Clinical Laboratory, Qionglai Medical Center Hospital, Sichuan, China [6]Department of Ophthalmology, Mass Eye and Ear, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, USA [7]Jinfeng Laboratory, Chongqing, China [8]Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Single nucleotide polymorphism Diabetic retinopathy Type 2 diabetes mellitus Meta-analysis Funnel plots

摘要:
Identifying the genetic risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR) is essential for discovering the potential pathogenesis of DR. This study determined the association of DR with five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) specifically in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, including rs10061133(MIR-449B), rs17883901(GCLC), rs2070744(eNOS), rs3759890 (SORD) and rs7754561 (ENPP1). A total of 1433 individuals were enrolled in this study, comprising healthy controls (ctrls = 480), individuals with diabetes mellitus without retinopathy (DNR = 480), non-proliferative DR(NPDR = 378), and proliferative DR(PDR = 95). The five SNPs were genotyped utilizing Mass ARRAY MALDI-TOF technology. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for the risk of genotype and allele. We performed a literature search in PubMed published before July 16, 2023. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the overall quality of the case-control studies. Consequently, we found that there were statistically significant differences between PDR cases and healthy controls for rs10061133 (P = 0.007, OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.32-2.23) and rs17883901 (P = 0.020, OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.08-2.57), rs17883901 was significantly associated with NPDR (P = 0.023, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.05-1.85), there was a significant association between DR cases and healthy controls (P = 0.048, OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00-1.48) for rs3759890 in the allelic model. DR show no relationships with the other two SNPs compared to healthy controls. In multivariate analyses comparing the DR and DNR groups, rs7754561(A), rs10061133(G), and rs17883901(A) were identified as risk loci for DR in individuals with a duration of diabetes of ≥5 years (P = 0.0023, P = 0.0037, and P = 0.0376, respectively). Furthermore, individuals carrying rs10061133(G) exhibited a higher risk of DR in the hyperglycemic group (glucose ≥8 mmol/L). Secondly, we showed that one polymorphism in eNOS (rs2070744, T > C) showed a suggestive association with DR in the meta-analysis (allelic model:P < 0.05, OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.07-1.30, Z = 3.46, I2 = 34%). Subsequently, including studies that used either healthy subjects or diabetic subjects without DR as controls, the association of eNOS rs2070744 with DR was consistently significant (P = 0.002) and exhibited intermediate heterogeneity (I2 = 48%). Furthermore, polymorphisms in GCLC (rs17883901) and SORD (rs3759890) were also associated with DR, with P-values of 0.004 (I2 = 93%) and 0.03 (I2 = 3%), respectively, suggesting their potential involvement in the disease. In conclusion, this study documented that rs10061133(G), rs17883901(A), and rs3759890(G) could be the independent risk factors for retinopathy in Chinese patients with T2DM, offering a foundation for genetic risk assessment in clinical practice. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals a significant association between rs2070744 and DR, implying the potential involvement of the MIR-449B, GCLC, SORD, and eNOS variants in the development of DR, which could be a promising direction for developing new treatments aimed at mitigating the risk of DR in susceptible populations.Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 眼科学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]The Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Disease Gene Study, Center for Medical Genetics, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Research Unit for Blindness Prevention of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU026), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]The Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory for Human Disease Gene Study, Center for Medical Genetics, Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Research Unit for Blindness Prevention of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (2019RU026), Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People’s Hospital, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:54684 今日访问量:0 总访问量:4646 更新日期:2025-03-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号