高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Prognostic value of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA level during posttreatment follow-up in the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma having undergone intensity-modulated radiotherapy

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [4]Guangzhou Blood Ctr, Dept Blood Source Management, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Epstein-Barr virus DNA Follow-up Tumor recurrence

摘要:
Background: The value of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA assay during posttreatment follow-up of the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) presenting with different pretreatment plasma EBV DNA levels remains unclear. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of plasma EBV DNA assay during posttreatment followup in the patients with NPC who have undergone intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Methods: The medical records of 385 NPC patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy between November 2009 and February 2012 were reviewed. All patients underwent plasma EBV DNA assays before treatment, within 3 months after treatment, and then every 3-12 months during posttreatment follow-up period. The recurrence rates for patients with different pretreatment and posttreatment follow-up plasma EBV DNA levels were analyzed. Results: Of the 385 patients, 267 (69.4%) had detectable pretreatment plasma EBV DNA (> 0 copy/mL) and 93 (24.2%) had detectable posttreatment EBV DNA during a median follow-up of 52.8 months (range 9.3-73.8 months). Detectable EBV DNA during posttreatment follow-up was found in 14.4% (17/118) and 28.5% (76/267) of patients with undetectable and detectable pretreatment EBV DNA, respectively, and was significantly associated with tumor recurrence in both patient groups. EBV DNA was detectable in 12.8% (40/313) of patients who remained disease-free, 56.4% (22/39) of patients with locoregional recurrence alone, and 93.9% (31/33) of patients with distant metastasis as the first recurrence event (P < 0.001); 6.5% (19/292) of patients with undetectable EBV DNA and 57.0% (53/93) of patient with detectable EBV DNA during posttreatment follow-up experienced tumor recurrence. Compared with other cut-off values, the cut-off value of 0 copy/mL for EBV DNA during posttreatment follow-up had the highest area under the ROC curve (AUC) value (0.804, 95% confidence interval 0.741-0.868) for predicting tumor recurrence (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy: 73.6%, 87.2%, and 84.7%, respectively). Conclusion: Plasma EBV DNA level during posttreatment follow-up is a good marker for predicting distant metastasis but not locoregional recurrence in the patients with NPC irrespective of the pretreatment EBV DNA levels.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Prognostic value of serum Epstein-Barr virus antibodies in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and undetectable pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA [2]Is pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA still associated with 6-year survival outcomes in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma? [3]Clinical Significance of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-Like Carcinoma (LELC) Patients [4]The Effect of Adding Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Undetectable Pretreatment Epstein-Barr Virus DNA [5]Novel biomarkers of nasopharyngeal carcinoma metastasis risk identified by reverse phase protein array based tumor profiling with consideration of plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load [6]Analysis of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA to Screen for Nasopharyngeal Cancer [7]Associations of Epstein-Barr Virus DNA in PBMCs and the Subtypes with Breast Cancer Risk [8]Pretreatment Alkaline Phosphatase and Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Predict Poor Prognosis and Response to Salvage Radiotherapy in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Metachronous Bone-Only Metastasis [9]Predictive value of therapeutic monitoring with plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA in Extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma, nasal type [10]Prognostic values of the integrated model incorporating the volume of metastatic regional cervical lymph node and pretreatment serum Epstein-Barr virus DNA copy number in predicting distant metastasis in patients with N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

资源点击量:46424 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3323 更新日期:2024-11-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号