高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy using mFOLFOX versus transarterial chemoembolization for massive unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective non-randomized

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C

机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Dept Hepatobiliar, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy Transarterial chemoembolization mFOLFOX

摘要:
Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the standard care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A-B. However, the efficacy of TACE on large (>= 10 cm) stage A-B HCC is far from satisfactory, and it is proposed that hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) might be a better first-line treatment of this disease. Hence, we compared the safety and efficacy of HAIC with the modified FOLFOX (mFOLFOX) regimen and those of TACE in patients with massive unresectable HCC. Methods: A prospective, non-randomized, phase II study was conducted on patients with massive unresectable HCC. The protocol involved HAIC with the mFOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m(2) intra-arterial infusion; leucovorin, 400 mg/m(2) intra-arterial infusion; and fluorouracil, 400 mg/m(2) bolus infusion and 2400 mg/m(2) continuous infusion) every 3 weeks and TACE with 50 mg of epirubicin, 50 mg of lobaplatin, 6 mg of mitomycin, and lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The tumor responses, time-to-progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Results: A total of 79 patients were recruited for this study: 38 in the HAIC group and 41 in the TACE group. The HAIC group exhibited higher partial response and disease control rates than did the TACE group (52.6% vs. 9.8%, P < 0.001; 83.8% vs. 52.5%, P = 0.004). The median TTPs for the HAIC and TACE groups were 5.87 and 3.6 months (hazard radio [HR] = 2.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.16-4.76, P = 0.015). More patients in the HAIC group than in the TACE group underwent resection (10 vs. 3, P = 0.033). The proportions of grade 3-4 adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) were lower in the HAIC group than in the TACE group (grade 3-4 AEs: 13 vs. 27, P = 0.007; SAEs: 6 vs. 15, P = 0.044). More patients in the TACE group than in the HAIC group had the study treatment terminated early due to intolerable treatment-related adverse events or the withdrawal of consent (10 vs. 2, P = 0.026). Conclusions: HAIC with mFOLFOX yielded significantly better treatment responses and less serious toxicity than did TACE. HAIC might represent a feasible and promising first-line treatment for patients with massive unresectable HCC.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Dept Hepatobiliar, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Canc Ctr, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China,Dept Hepatobiliar, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43377 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号