高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Survival outcomes of patients with lobular carcinoma in situ who underwent bilateral mastectomy or partial mastectomy

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China [2]Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China [3]Department of Clinical Research, First Hospital of Changsha City, No. 311, Yinpan Road, Changsha, 410005, PR China [4]Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA, 30322, United States [5]Department of Radiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Lobular carcinoma in situ Prophylactic mastectomy Partial mastectomy Survival

摘要:
Aim: To compare the survival outcomes between patients treated with bilateral mastectomy and partial mastectomy alone as the initial surgical management for primary lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). Patients and methods: Patients with histologically confirmed LCIS underwent partial mastectomy alone or bilateral mastectomy were identified by the SEER*Stat database (version 8.3.2) released in 2016. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome measure was breast cancer-specific mortality. Results: Of the 5964 cases included in the analysis, 208 cases underwent bilateral mastectomy and 5756 cases underwent partial mastectomy alone. The 1-, 5-and 10-year estimated overall survival rates were 99.7%, 96.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate proportional hazards regression (Cox) analyses showed no significant difference between the risk of all-cause mortality in the bilateral mastectomy group compared with the partial mastectomy group (HR = 1.106, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.350-3.500, P = 0.86). In propensity score-matched model, bilateral mastectomy still did not show benefit to overall mortality (HR = 2.248, 95% CI 0.451-11.200). Patients older than 60 years of age showed a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 7.593, 95% CI 5.357-10.764, P < 0.0001). No risk factors, including surgery type, were identified for breast cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Survival outcomes of patients with LCIS who underwent partial mastectomy without radiotherapy were not inferior to patients who underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Breast cancer-specific mortality in patients with LCIS was extremely low; aggressive prophylactic surgery like bilateral prophylactic mastectomy should not be advocated for most patients with LCIS. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China [*1]Department of Breast Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, 651 Dong Feng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43377 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号