高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Prognostic value of total tumor volume in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. [2]Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, First People’s Hospital of Foshan Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China. [3]Department of Medical Statistics, First People’s Hospital of Foshan Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China. [4]Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Intensity-modulated radiotherapy Tumor volume Treatment failure Staging system

摘要:
Background: Few studies have evaluated the prognostic value of total tumor volume (TTV), which reflects both the primary tumor volume and nodal tumor volume, in NPC. Furthermore, the relationship between TTV and survival remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of TTV in patients with NPC treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods: TTV was retrospectively assessed in 455 patients with newly diagnosed, non-metastatic NPC. All patients were treated using IMRT; 91.1% (288/316) of patients with stage III-IVb also received cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to identify the optimal TTV cut-off point and examine the prognostic value of combined TTV with current clinical stage. Results: Mean TTV was 11.1 cm(3) (range, 0.3-27.9 cm(3)) in stage I, 22.5 cm(3) (1.3-92.4 cm(3)) in stage II, 40.6 cm(3) in stage III (3.2-129.2 cm(3)), and 77.5 cm(3) in stage IVa-b (7.1-284.1 cm(3)). For all patients, the 4-year estimated FFS, OS, DMFS, and LRRFS rates for patients with a TTV <= 28 vs. > 28 cm(3) were 93 vs. 71.4% (P < 0.001), 95.1 vs. 75.4% (P < 0.001), 94.5 vs. 79.4% (P < 0.001), and 96.2 vs. 88% (P = 0.001). TTV was an independent prognostic factor for FFS, OS, DMFS and LRRFS in all patients. In stage III-IVb, 4-year estimated FFS, OS, DMFS, and LRRFS for a TTV <= 28 vs. > 28 cm(3) were 88.9 vs. 70.5% (P = 0.001), 96.2 vs. 72.7% (P < 0.001), 91.2 vs. 78.3% (P = 0.008), and 93.8 vs. 87.6% (P = 0.063). TTV was an independent prognostic factor for FFS, OS and DMFS in stage III-IVb. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis curves revealed adding TTV to clinical stage had superior prognostic value for treatment failure compared to clinical stage alone (P = 0.016). Conclusions: TTV is an important prognosticator for treatment outcome and significantly improves the prognostic value of the current staging system for patients with NPC treated with IMRT.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. [2]Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, First People’s Hospital of Foshan Affiliated to Sun Yat-sen University, Foshan, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China. [4]Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:46407 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3323 更新日期:2024-11-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号