高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Comparison of safety and effectiveness between endoscopic ultrasound-guided and ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy in focal pancreatic disease: a multi-center, retrospective, propensity score analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. [2]Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. [3]Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound Imaging & Interventional Therapy, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. [4]Department of Ultrasound, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. [5]Department of Ultrasonography, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China. [6]Department of Ultrasonography, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China. [7]Department of Ultrasound, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, Henan, China. [8]Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Image-Guided Biopsy Pancreatic Neoplasms Diagnosis Propensity Score

摘要:
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and ultrasound (US) are the two primary imaging modalities used to guide pancreatic needle biopsy. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and complications associated with EUS- and US-guided pancreatic biopsies.A total of 2517 consecutive patients who underwent 2583 cases of EUS- or US-guided pancreatic biopsy for focal pancreatic disease between January 2017 and December 2023 at seven university teaching hospitals were included. The endpoints evaluated were diagnostic inaccuracy, complications, and repeat biopsies for each method. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used for the analysis.For the entire cohort, diagnostic inaccuracies were observed in 7.0% of cases in the EUS-guided biopsy group compared to 3.5% in the US-guided biopsy group, representing a statistically significant difference (p = 0.001). The rates of major (p = 1.000) and minor complications (p = 0.309) were similar between the two groups. The rate of repeat biopsies was significantly higher in the EUS-guided biopsy group than in the US-guided biopsy group (5.0% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.024). However, after balancing lesion characteristics using PSM, no significant differences were observed between the EUS- and US-guided biopsies in diagnostic inaccuracy (7.2% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.600), major complications (0.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.499), minor complications (1.7% vs. 0.2%, p = 0.069), or repeat biopsy rate (5.5% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.656). Subgroup analysis revealed that among patients with exophytic and backward growth pancreatic lesions, both diagnostic inaccuracy (7.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.001) and the repeat biopsy rate (10.7% vs. 27.8%, p = 0.029) were significantly lower in the EUS-guided biopsy group compared to the US-guided biopsy group.This study confirmed that both EUS-guided and US-guided pancreatic biopsies are safe and effective for patients with focal pancreatic disease. After PSM, diagnostic inaccuracy, repeat biopsy and complication rates were similar, but EUS-guided biopsy was preferred for lesions with exophytic and backward growth morphology.Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. [8]Zhejiang University Cancer Center, Zhejiang, Hangzhou, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration to diagnose a recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the parapharyngeal space [2]A novel technique of endonasopharyngeal ultrasound-guided transnasopharyngeal needle aspiration in the diagnosis of submucosal recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy. [3]Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. [4]Impact of marital status at diagnosis on survival and its change over time between 1973 and 2012 in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis [5]Contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with percutaneous ultrasound-guide core needle biopsies in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions: a propensity score-matched study [6]Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. [7]Laparoscopic versus open surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score analysis of short- term outcomes [8]Association of immunosuppression treatment with generalization among patients with ocular myasthenia gravis: A propensity score analysis. [9]Combining cetuximab with chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A propensity score analysis [10]Propensity-score-matched evaluation of under-recognition of acute kidney injury and short-term outcomes

资源点击量:65773 今日访问量:3 总访问量:5151 更新日期:2025-12-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号