高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Short- and long-term outcomes for early large esophageal carcinoma patients treated via double- and single-tunnel super minimally invasive surgery: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China [2]Nanjing Univ, Affiliated Drum Tower Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Med Sch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China [3]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst, Sichuan Clin Res Ctr Canc, Sichuan Canc Ctr,Dept Endoscopy, Chengdu, Peoples R China [4]970 Hosp PLA Joint Logist Support Force, Dept Gastroenterol, Yantai, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Early esophageal carcinoma Super minimally invasive surgery Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection Therapeutic efficiency Short-term outcomes Long-term outcomes

摘要:
Background and study aim Super minimally invasive surgery (SMIS) via endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) has shown promising preliminary efficacy for the treatment of large early esophageal cancer (EEC). This study reports the short- and long-term outcomes of both single- and double-tunnel ESTD for large EEC. Patients and methods All 90 patients with large EEC underwent ESTD at three hospitals between December 2013 and March 2024. We divided patients into two groups (single-tunnel SMIS and double-tunnel SMIS). Main outcome measurements: rates of en bloc resection, complete resection (R0 resection), curative resection, dissection speed and complications were evaluated as short-term outcomes. Overall survival, local or distant recurrence, and postoperative stricture rates were evaluated as long-term outcomes. Results For all patients, the en bloc and R0 resection rates were 97.8% and 67.8%, respectively. Post-ESTD bleeding and fever were detected in 8.9% and 17.8% of the procedures, respectively. Postoperative stenosis and recurrence occurred in 54 patients (60.0%) and 7 patients (9.5%), respectively. Among the 90 patients with different circumferential-extent lesions, those who received a double-tunnel ESTD procedure (n = 54) underwent dissection faster than those who received a single-tunnel ESTD procedure (n = 36, 0.25 vs. 0.19 cm(2)/min, P = 0.012). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of short-term postoperative complications, postoperative esophageal stenosis, survival or recurrence rates (P > 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that whole-circumferential lesions were an independent risk factor for technical difficulties. Conclusion ESTD was effective for treating large early esophageal carcinoma. Compared with single-tunnel ESTD, double-tunnel ESTD has a faster resection speed, and there was no significant difference in short-term postoperative complications or long-term follow-up results. Therefore, double-tunnel ESTD is safe, reliable and more efficient in the treatment of large EEC.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
Q1 SURGERY
最新[2024]版:
Q1 SURGERY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:65780 今日访问量:0 总访问量:5151 更新日期:2025-12-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号