高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer ineligible for platinum-based doublet chemotherapy

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE ◇ SSCI

机构: [1]Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Div Abdominal Tumor Multimodal Treatment, Chengdu, Peoples R China [2]Sichuan Canc Hosp & Inst, Sichuan Clin Res Ctr Canc, Sichuan Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Chengdu, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: atezolizumab immunotherapy cost-effectiveness non-small-cell lung cancer Markov model

摘要:
Background Atezolizumab has recently demonstrated improved prognosis in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not eligible for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen, as observed in a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab for the treatment of NSCLC from the perspective of payers in both developed and developing countries.Materials and methods A Markov model was developed to simulate treatment scenarios involving atezolizumab or chemotherapy for patients diagnosed with NSCLC. The model estimated the transition probabilities, health care costs, and health utilities base on the risk of disease progression, survival, and toxicity using data from IPSOS clinical trials, relevant literature, and publicly available databases. A price simulation was conducted to guide the pricing strategy at the specified willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold, and sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model's response to uncertainty.Results Among patients with NSCLC who are not suitable for treatment with a platinum-containing regimen, the use of atezolizumab led to an incremental gain of 0.35 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) compared to chemotherapy. The ICER for atezolizumab compared to chemotherapy was calculated at $220400.53 per QALY in the US and $101874.61 per QALY in China. The price simulation results indicated that atezolizumab was favored in the US when the price was less than $371.28/60 mg and $474.92/60 mg at the WTP thresholds of $100,000 and $150,000, respectively; it was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $36023.71when the price was about 40% of the current price in China. Sensitivity analysis revealed that variables such as the price of atezolizumab and utilities influenced the r model's outcomes, although these factors did not significantly alter the overall conclusion.Conclusion Atezolizumab was not considered cost-effective at the WTP thresholds of $150,000 per QALY in the US and $36,024 per QALY in China for patients with advanced NSCLC who are ineligible for platinum-based chemotherapy.

基金:
语种:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
JCR分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
最新[2023]版:
Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH

影响因子: 最新[2023版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Canc Ctr, Div Abdominal Tumor Multimodal Treatment, Chengdu, Peoples R China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Financial Toxicity for Pembrolizumab and Atezolizumab for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses [2]Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 expression levels: A comprehensive overview [3]Cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant therapy with atezolizumab in Chinese patients with stage IB-IIIA resectable NSCLC after adjuvant chemotherapy [4]Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nedaplatin versus cisplatin in stage II-IVB nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis. [5]Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy combinations with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a modelling approach [6]Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis [7]Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib as second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. [8]OSIMERTINIB AS FIRST-LINE AND SECOND-LINE THERAPY FOR EGFR MUTATION-POSITIVE ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER: A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN CHINA [9]Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination strategies among men who have sex with men in China: a modeling study [10]Durvalumab vs placebo consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: An updated PACIFIC trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis.

资源点击量:59059 今日访问量:0 总访问量:4849 更新日期:2025-06-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号