Recent studies have shown the potential of fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET imaging for pancreatic cancer assessment.This article is dedicated to comparing the diagnostic efficacy of FAPI PET and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in the evaluation of primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases in pancreatic cancer.In this review, we conducted a systematic search of studies published in PubMed and Web of Science databases up to September 18, 2023. All included studies used radionuclide labeled FAPI and FDG as PET diagnostic tracers to evaluate their applicability in patients with pancreatic cancer.The FAPI PET imaging group showed significantly higher sensitivity in the detection of primary lesions (1.000, [95% CI: 0.999-1.000]), lymph node metastases (0.624 [95% CI: 0.391-0.834]) and distant metastatic (0.965 [95% CI: 0.804-1.000]) in pancreatic cancer compared to the FDG PET imaging group (0.889 [95% CI: 0.788-0.966], 0.373 [95% CI: 0.163-0.606] and 0.889 [95% CI: 0.689-0.999], respectively). Furthermore, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FAPI PET imaging is significantly higher than that in FDG imaging for primary lesions (mean difference (MD) = 7.51, 95% CI: 5.34-9.67).Compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT, FAPI PET imaging showed higher sensitivity, SUVmax. This method can be effectively utilized for the evaluation of pancreatic cancer.Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor PET may be a better alternative to [18F]FDG in evaluating primary pancreatic cancer, lymph node metastases, and distant metastases.Fibroblast activating protein inhibitor (FAPI) PET is compared with FDG PET for evaluating pancreatic cancer. Multiple radiolabeled FAPI variants have shown promising results in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. FAPI PET imaging effectively helps clinicians diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer.© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.