高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

The efficacy and safety of first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients: a comparison of PD-1 inhibitor and carboplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [2]Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China [3]Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China [4]Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China [5]Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China [6]Department of Urology, The second hospital of Tianjin medical university, Tianjin, China [7]Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China [8]The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China [9]The Department of Urology, AnHui NO. 2 Provincial People Hospital, Hefei, China [10]Department of Pathology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma PD-1 inhibitor carboplatin Cisplatinineligible

摘要:
Although several programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma, their efficacy remains unknown in cisplatin-ineligible patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Data for patients with UTUC were retrospectively retrieved from the electronic medical records of nine institutions between 2018 and 2021. Patients considered ineligible for cisplatin who received either PD-1 inhibitors (n = 70) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (n = 53) were included. Efficacy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The objective response rate (ORR) was comparable between the PD-1 inhibitor and carboplatin-gemcitabine groups (38.6% versus 41.5%). Median PFS was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-8.0) in the PD-1 inhibitor group, versus 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.8-8.2) in the carboplatin-gemcitabine group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.741, 95% CI: 0.485-1.132, p = .166). Median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 4.1-31.9) in the PD-1 inhibitor group, compared with 14 months (95% CI: 12.1-15.9) in the carboplatin-gemcitabine group (HR = 0.731, 95% CI: 0.426-1.256, p = .257). The duration of response was significantly longer in the PD-1 inhibitor group than in the carboplatin-gemcitabine group (not reached vs. 9 months, p < .001). Treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the PD-1 inhibitor group than in the carboplatin-gemcitabine group (57.1% vs. 77.3%). In conclusion, PD-1 inhibitors displayed promising efficacy with less toxicity and longer DOR in the first-line treatment of UTUC in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 免疫学 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 免疫学 2 区 肿瘤学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China [*1]Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1630 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, Pudong District 200127, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43378 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号