高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Somatostatin Receptor 2: A Potential Predictive Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. [2]Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China. [3]Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. [4]Center of Growth, Metabolism and Aging, Key Laboratory of Bio-Resources and Eco-Environment, College of Life Sciences, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. [5]Research Institute, GloriousMed Clinical Laboratory (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), the most abundant receptor of somatostatin (SST), possesses immunoreactivity and is altered in many cancers. However, the association between SSTR2 and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not yet been reported. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) information across 20 cancers was collected from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) and used to analyze the expression of SSTR2. Immune signatures collected from public databases, such as BioCarta or Reactome, were used to investigate the association between SSTR2 and the tumor microenviroment in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Data from cohorts treated with ICIs were collected to assess whether SSTR2 is associated with benefits from ICIs treatment. In the HPA, we found the SSTR2 IHC-positive rate of 13 cancers to be above 50%. Five types of cancer express SSTR2 mildly (positive rate: 25%-50%), while the remaining two types of cancer barely stained SSTR2-positive (positive rate: 0%-24%). In TCGA analysis, immune cell signatures and immune function pathways were enriched in high SSTR2 expression groups in most cancers. In each ICIs treated cohort, patients with high SSTR2 expression experienced numerically superior objective response rate (Braun: 14.8% vs 13.4%, p = 0.85; Gide: 69.4% vs 40.5%, p = 0.025; Mariathasan: 22.4% vs 16.7%, p = 0.233; Miao: 37.5% vs 11.8%; Riaz: 32.0% vs 7.7%, p = 0.067) and overall survival (Braun: HR (95%CI): 0.80 [0.62-1.04], p = 0.80; Gide: HR (95%CI): 0.61 [0.29-1.30], p = 0.20; Mariathasan: HR (95%CI): 0.83 [0.64-1.08], p = 0.16; Miao: HR (95%CI): 0.24 [0.086-0.65], p = 0.0028; Nathanson cohort: HR (95%CI): 0 [0-inf], p = 0.18; Riaz: HR (95%CI): 0.24 [0.086-0.65], p = 0.028) than patients with low SSTR2 expression. In pooled cohort, we found these differences were significant (Pool: 24.6% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0077; HR (95% CI): 0.77 [0.65-0.91], p = 0.0018). Our results suggest that SSTR2 is a potential predictive biomarker for response to ICIs.Copyright © 2022 Wang, Yuan, Chu, Gao, Jin, Jia and Zhu.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 病理学 4 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 4 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学 4 区 病理学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. [2]Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China.
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Institute of Cancer, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. [2]Chongqing Key Laboratory of Tumor Immunotherapy, Chongqing, China.
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:46407 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3323 更新日期:2024-11-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号