高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Clinical and oncologic findings of extraprostatic extension on needle biopsy in de novo metastatic prostate cancer.

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:

收录情况: ◇ 统计源期刊 ◇ CSCD-C ◇ 卓越:梯队期刊

机构: [1]Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China [2]Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: extraprostatic extension metastatic prostate cancer prevalence prognosis

摘要:
This study aimed to explore the clinical and oncologic findings in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) and extraprostatic extension (EPE) on biopsy. We retrospectively evaluated data on 630 patients with de novo mPCa between January 2009 and December 2017 in the West China Hospital (Chengdu, China), including evaluating the relationships between EPE and other variables and the association of EPE with survival outcomes by the Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier curves, and the Cox proportional-hazards model. EPE was found in 70/630 patients, making a prevalence of 11.1%. The presence of EPE on biopsy was associated with higher Gleason scores and higher incidence of neuroendocrine differentiation (NED), intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), and perineural invasion (PNI). Compared with those without EPE, patients with EPE had shorter castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CFS; median: 14.1 vs 17.1 months, P = 0.015) and overall survival (OS; median: 43.7 vs 68.3 months, P = 0.032). According to multivariate analysis, EPE was not an independent predictor for survival. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients with favorable characteristics, including negative NED or IDC-P status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score <2, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <50 ng ml-1, had worse prognoses if EPE was detected. In patients with PSA <50 ng ml-1, EPE was a negative independent predictor for OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.239, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.218-14.756, P = 0.023). EPE was strongly associated with other aggressive clinicopathological features and poorer CFS and OS. These data suggest that EPE may be an indicator of poor prognosis, particularly in patients, otherwise considered likely to have favorable survival outcomes.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2020]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 男科学 3 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 男科学 3 区 泌尿学与肾脏学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43377 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号