机构:[1]Hemodialysis Center, Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China四川大学华西医院[2]Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China四川大学华西医院[3]Department of hepatobiliary surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China四川省肿瘤医院外科中心肝胆胰外科肝胆胰外科病区下肝胆胰外科肝胆胰外科[4]Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China四川大学华西医院
Background The 15-item care transition measure (CTM-15) is a reliable and valid instrument assessing the quality of care transition from patients' perspectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CTM-15 and the CTM-3 (a 3-item short version of the CTM-15) in Mainland China. Methodology/Findings This was a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 646 patients in a general tertiary-level hospital in Chengdu, China. The results indicated that the Cronbach's a values of the Chinese version of the two measures were 0.90 and 0.56, and the test-retest reliability values were 0.91 and 0.87, respectively. Three factors were extracted for the CTM-15 in Chinese populations. The CTM-15 and the CTM-3 scores discriminated well between patients with and without re-hospitalization for their index condition. The CTM-15 and the CTM-3 had significant positive relationships with self-rated health status. The CTM-3 score was significantly related to the CTM-15 score, and the CTM-3 score accounted for 64.23% of the variance of the CTM-15 score. Conclusions/Significance This study has demonstrated the psychometric properties of the CTM-15 and the CTM-3 in Mainland China. Although the Cronbach's a value of the CTM-3 is suboptimal, it has exhibited high test-retest reliability, convergent validity and criterion validity. Therefore, the CTM3 can substitute the CTM-15 as a performance measurement tool when the sample size is large enough to compensate its suboptimal reliability or the reduced response burden is a concern.
基金:
Science and Technology department of Sichuan Province [2014FZ0109]
第一作者机构:[1]Hemodialysis Center, Department of Nephrology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Cao Xiaoyi,Chen Lin,Diao Yongshu,et al.Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Care Transition Measure[J].PLOS ONE.2015,10(5):doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127403.
APA:
Cao, Xiaoyi,Chen, Lin,Diao, Yongshu,Tian, Lang,Liu, Wenjie&Jiang, Xiaolian.(2015).Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Care Transition Measure.PLOS ONE,10,(5)
MLA:
Cao, Xiaoyi,et al."Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of the Care Transition Measure".PLOS ONE 10..5(2015)