高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

A Prognostic Scoring Model for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 097, Houston, TX 77030 USA; [3]Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Houston, TX USA; [4]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Hosp Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China; [5]Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing, Peoples R China; [6]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA; [7]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Cardiovasc & Thorac Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Esophageal cancer Induction chemotherapy Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Prognosis

摘要:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify patients with esophageal cancer who may benefit from induction chemotherapy (IC) before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on the basis of a prognostic scoring model. Methods: Between 1998 and 2015, 535 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent nCRT were included for analysis, including 218 patients who received IC before nCRT (IC group) and 317 patients who did not receive IC (non-IC group). A prognostic scoring model was developed to predict disease-free survival (DFS) on the basis of a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: The median follow-up time was 63.5 months (range 8.0-178.5) for survivors. The 5-year DFS rates were similar between the IC and non-IC groups (53.7% vs. 45.1%, p = 0.196). Multivariate analysis determined that histologic grade, tumor location, baseline positron emission tomography maximum standard uptake value, and lymph node size were independent prognostic factors for DFS. A prognostic scoring system was constructed by using these four factors, with the total score ranging from 0 to 6.2. When the median value was used as a cutoff, low-risk (<= 3.5) and high-risk (>3.5) groups were identified. In the high-risk group, patients who received IC had a nonsignificantly higher pathologic complete response rate (p = 0.272) and a significantly better DFS (p = 0.03) than patients who did not receive IC. After propensity score matching, the high-risk group demonstrated a significantly improved DFS with IC, a benefit that was not observed in the low-risk group. Conclusions: On the basis of the prognostic scoring model, the addition of IC to nCRT may provide a DFS benefit in high-risk patients with a risk score higher than 3.5. Prospective validation is warranted. (C) 2017 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学 2 区 呼吸系统
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 1 区 肿瘤学 1 区 呼吸系统
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [2]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 097, Houston, TX 77030 USA;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43370 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号