高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Real-world cost-effectiveness of laparoscopy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Coll Publ Hlth, Room 637,17 Xu Zhou Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan; [2]Koo Fdn Sun Yat Sen Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Laparoscopic colectomy Open colectomy Colon cancer Patient outcomes Cost-effectiveness analysis Net monetary benefit

摘要:
Background Laparoscopic colectomy is increasingly being adopted for the treatment of colon cancer; however, the long-term effectiveness of this approach in a real-world clinical setting has yet to be verified. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and costs associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy from the perspective of the National Health Insurance (NHI) system in Taiwan. Methods A nationwide population-based colon cancer cohort was observed by linking the Taiwan Cancer Registry, claims data from NHI system, and the National Death Registry. Adult patients with Stage I to Stage III colon cancer who underwent primary cancer resection using either laparoscopy or open colectomy between 2009 and 2011 were included. A propensity score-matched cohort (1745 pairs) was applied to examine three clinical endpoints: overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-free survival within 2 years after the operation. To comply with the perspective as well as the analytic horizon of the study, we limited the research to NHI claims from the study population for the corresponding time period. The health outcomes and net monetary benefits were verified by multivariate mixed-effect models. Results This analysis revealed that laparoscopy resulted in longer overall survival (adjusted difference 16.8 days, 95 % CI 7.3-26.2), recurrence-free survival (16.8 days, 5.0-28.6) and disease-free survival (26.4 days, 7.4-45.4), compared to open colectomy at 2 years post-op. Laparoscopy also led to a significantly shorter length of stay (3.2 days, 2.4-3.9) and lower index hospitalization costs (US$ 455, 181-729) than open colectomy; however, no differences in costs were observed over the long term. Overall, laparoscopy was more cost-effective than open colectomy under various willingness-to-pay thresholds in the setting of the Taiwan NHI. Conclusions The continued adoption of laparoscopy in primary curable colon cancer resection is expected to reduce health care costs over the short term while providing considerable health benefits over the long term.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 外科
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Coll Publ Hlth, Room 637,17 Xu Zhou Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Coll Publ Hlth, Room 637,17 Xu Zhou Rd, Taipei 100, Taiwan;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43377 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号