Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for ascending-type nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of toxicity and prognosis
机构:[1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Dept Radiat Oncol,Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China;临床科室其他部门放疗科华南肿瘤学国家重点实验室中山大学肿瘤防治中心[2]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhuhai 519001, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[3]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Guangzhou 510120, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[4]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Stat & Epidemiol, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[5]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Hlth Informat Res Ctr, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[6]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Guangdong Key Lab Med, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Background: In the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in treating ascending-type nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is under-evaluated. This study was to compare the efficacy of NACT followed by IMRT (NACT + RT) with the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) on ascending-type NPC. Methods: Clinical data of 214 patients with ascending-type NPC treated with NACT + RT or CCRT between December 2009 and July 2011 were analyzed. Of the 214 patients, 98 were treated with NACT followed by IMRT, and 116 were treated with CCRT. The survival rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the survival curves were compared using a log-rank test. Results: The 4-year overall survival, locoregional failure-free survival, distant failure-free survival, and failure-free survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). However, patients in the CCRT group exhibited more severe acute adverse events than did patients in the NACT + RT group during radiotherapy, including leukopenia (30.2% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.016), neutropenia (25.9% vs. 11.2%, P = 0.011), and mucositis (57.8% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.028). After radiotherapy, patients in the CCRT group exhibited significantly higher rates of xerostomia (21.6% vs. 10.2%, P = 0.041) and hearing loss (17.2% vs. 6.1%, P = 0.023). Conclusions: The treatment outcomes of the NACT + RT and CCRT groups were similar; however, CCRT led to higher rates of acute and late toxicities. NACT + RT may therefore be a better treatment strategy for ascending-type NPC.
基金:
Science and Technology Project of Guangzhou City, China [14570006]; National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China [81372409, 81402532]; Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program [2012011]
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类|3 区医学
小类|3 区肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
无
第一作者:
第一作者机构:[1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Dept Radiat Oncol,Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[2]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 5, Dept Radiat Oncol, Zhuhai 519001, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Dept Radiat Oncol,Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Yao Ji-Jin,Yu Xiao-Li,Zhang Fan,et al.Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for ascending-type nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of toxicity and prognosis[J].CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER.2017,36(1):-.doi:10.1186/s40880-017-0195-6.
APA:
Yao, Ji-Jin,Yu, Xiao-Li,Zhang, Fan,Zhang, Wang-Jian,Zhou, Guan-Qun...&Sun, Ying.(2017).Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for ascending-type nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of toxicity and prognosis.CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER,36,(1)
MLA:
Yao, Ji-Jin,et al."Radiotherapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for ascending-type nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective comparison of toxicity and prognosis".CHINESE JOURNAL OF CANCER 36..1(2017):-