Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis
Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes between proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods and Materials: From 2007 through 2014, 343 EC patients who received definitive CRT with either PBT (n = 132) or IMRT (n = 211) were retrospectively analyzed. Survival, recurrence, and treatment toxicity were compared between groups. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to test the association between patient/treatment variables and survival. Results: Patient/treatment variables were overall well balanced, except for age and race. Compared with IMRT, PBT had significantly better overall survival (OS; P = .011), progression-free survival (PFS; P = .001), distant metastasisefree survival (DMFS; P = .031), as well as marginally better locoregional failureefree survival (LRFFS; P = .075). No significant differences in rates of treatment-related toxicities were observed between groups. On multivariate analysis, IMRT had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.454; P = .01), PFS (HR 1.562; P = .001), and LRFFS (HR 1.461; P = .041) than PBT. Subgroup analysis by clinical stage revealed considerably higher 5-year OS (34.6% vs 25.0%, P = .038) and PFS rates (33.5% vs 13.2%, P = .005) in the PBT group for patients with stage III disease. However, no significant intergroup differences in survival were identified for stage I/II patients. Conclusions: Compared with IMRT, PBT might be associated with improved OS, PFS, and LRFFS, especially in EC patients with locally advanced disease. These results need confirmation by prospective studies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
基金:
Mabuchi Research Fund; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantUnited States Department of Health & Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USANIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) [CA016672]
语种:
外文
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类|2 区医学
小类|2 区肿瘤学2 区核医学
最新[2023]版:
大类|1 区医学
小类|2 区肿瘤学2 区核医学
第一作者:
第一作者机构:[1]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Unit 97,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA;[6]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Canc Ctr,Dept Radiat Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China;[7]Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll, Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Beijing, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构:[1]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Unit 97,1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
Xi Mian,Xu Cai,Liao Zhongxing,et al.Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS.2017,99(3):667-676.doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.06.2450.
APA:
Xi, Mian,Xu, Cai,Liao, Zhongxing,Chang, Joe Y.,Gomez, Daniel R....&Lin, Steven H..(2017).Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS,99,(3)
MLA:
Xi, Mian,et al."Comparative Outcomes After Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Using Proton Beam Therapy Versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: A Retrospective, Single-Institutional Analysis".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS 99..3(2017):667-676