高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Therapeutic Efficacy Comparison of 5 Major EGFR-TKIs in Advanced EGFR-positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis Based on Head-to-Head Trials

文献详情

资源类型:
机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [4]Zhongshan Sch Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [5]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

关键词: Afatinib Dacomitinib Erlotinib Gefitinib Icotinib

摘要:
This is the first head-to-head-based network meta-analysis making multiple therapeutic comparisons of 5 current epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-positive patients with nonesmall-cell lung cancer that integrates the latest data. The results indicated a preferable therapeutic efficacy in the second-generation TKIs (dacomitinib and afatinib) when compared with the first-generation TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib). Background: Five major first-and second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), including erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, afatinib, and dacomitinib, are currently optional for patients with advanced nonesmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor EGFR mutations. However, there was no head-to-head-based network meta-analysis among all the TKIs in EGFR-mutated populations. Methods: Eligible literature was searched from an electronic database. Data of objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival were extracted from enrolled studies. Multiple treatment comparisons based on Bayesian network integrated the efficacy of all included treatments. Results: Six phase III randomized trials involving 1055 EGFR-mutated patients with advanced NSCLC were enrolled. Multiple treatment comparisons showed that 5 different EGFR-TKIs shared equivalent therapeutic efficacy in terms of all outcome measures. Rank probabilities indicated that dacomitinib and afatinib had potentially better efficacy compared with erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib in the EGFR-mutated patients. When compared with other agents, potential survival benefits (progression-free and overall survival) were observed in dacomitinib, whereas afatinib showed a better rank probability in overall response rate and disease control rate. Conclusion: Our study indicated a preferable therapeutic efficacy in the second-generation TKIs (dacomitinib and afatinib) when compared with the first-generation TKIs (erlotinib, gefitinib, and icotinib). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 3 区 肿瘤学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 医学
小类 | 4 区 肿瘤学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Med Oncol, Canc Ctr, 651 Dongfeng Rd East, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [2]State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [3]Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

相关文献

[1]Afatinib versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Patients Aged >= 75 Years: Subgroup Analysis of LUX-Lung 7 [2]First-Line Afatinib versus Gefitinib in EGFRm plus Advanced NSCLC: Updated Overall Survival Analysis of LUX-Lung 7 [3]Comparison of first-generation EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib, erlotinib, and icotinib) as adjuvant therapy in resected NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations [4]Afatinib vs gefitinib for treatment-naive patients with EGFRm1 NSCLC (LUX-Lung 7): Analysis of time to treatment failure and impact of afatinib dose adjustment [5]Afatinib versus gefitinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: overall survival data from the phase IIb LUX-Lung 7 trial [6]A fully validated method for simultaneous determination of icotinib, osimertinib, gefitinib and O-desmethyl gefitinib in human plasma using UPLC-MS/MS for therapeutic drug monitoring [7]Elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line gefitinib or erlotinib treatment [8]Afatinib (A) vs gefitinib (G) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm1) NSCLC: Updated OS data from the phase IIb trial LUX-Lung 7 (LL7) [9]Afatinib vs gefitinib in patients (pts) with EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm plus ) NSCLC: overall survival (OS) data from LUX-Lung 7 (LL7) [10]Efficacy and Safety of Erlotinib vs Vinorelbine/Cisplatin as Adjuvant Therapy for Stage IIIA EGFR Mutant NSCLC Patients

资源点击量:43377 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号