高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Recursive Partitioning Analysis Identifies Pretreatment Risk Groups for the Utility of Induction Chemotherapy Before Definitive Chemoradiation Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

文献详情

资源类型:

收录情况: ◇ EI

机构: [1]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 097, Houston, TX 77030 USA; [2]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA; [3]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China; [4]Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol Human Genet & Environm Sci, Houston, TX USA
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Purpose: To assess the contribution of induction chemotherapy (IC) before definitive chemoradiation therapy (dCRT) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) based on recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Methods and Materials: A total of 496 eligible patients with EC staged by positron emission tomography (PET) who received dCRT from 1998 to 2015 were included, 162 (32.7%) of whom underwent IC before dCRT. RPA was used to risk-stratify patients on the basis of independent prognostic factors to predict progression-free survival (PFS). Outcomes were compared between treatment groups. Results: The median follow-up time was 49.1 months (range, 7.0-155.9 months) for survivors. Compared with the non-IC group, the IC group had a comparable 5-year PFS rate (21.0% vs 23.4%; P=.726) in the whole cohort. Multivariate analysis identified age, performance status, primary tumor length, baseline PET maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), and maximum lymph node diameter as independent prognostic factors for PFS. RPA segregated patients into 3 prognostic groups: low-risk group (PET SUVmax <9.7 and tumor length <= 5 cm), intermediate-risk group (PET SUVmax >= 9.7 and age >= 67), and high-risk group (PET SUVmax <9.7 and tumor length >5 cm, or PET SUVmax >= 9.7 and age <67). Significant improvements in PFS (P=.006) and locoregional failureefree survival (P=.028) in the IC group in comparison with the non-IC group were observed in high-risk patients, whereas no differences in survival were found between the 2 treatment groups in low-risk or intermediate-risk patients. After propensity score matching, the high-risk group still demonstrated a significantly improved PFS with IC (P=.009). Conclusions: The RPA prognostic grouping provides a useful method of selecting high-risk EC patients who may benefit from IC before receiving dCRT. Prospective validation is warranted. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2017]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学 2 区 核医学
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 1 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 肿瘤学 2 区 核医学
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 097, Houston, TX 77030 USA; [3]Sun Yat Sen Univ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol,State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China;
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Unit 097, Houston, TX 77030 USA;
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:43370 今日访问量:0 总访问量:3120 更新日期:2024-09-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号