高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Intrathecal Drug Delivery System in Prepontine Cistern for Patients with Intractable Craniofacial Cancer Pain: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

文献详情

资源类型:
WOS体系:

收录情况: ◇ SCIE

机构: [1]Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Pain Management & Anesthesiol, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China [2]Hunan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [3]Chenzhou First Peoples Hosp, Dept Pain Management, Chenzhou, Hunan, Peoples R China [4]Yueyang Tradit Chinese Med Hosp, Dept Pain Management, Yueyang, Hunan, Peoples R China [5]Zhuzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Pain Management, Zhuzhou, Hunan, Peoples R China [6]Univ South China, Hosp 2, Dept Pain & Rehabil, Hengyang, Hunan, Peoples R China [7]Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China [8]Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Chengdu, Peoples R China [9]Harbin Med Univ, Dept Pain Management, Affiliated Hosp 4, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China [10]Cent South Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Anesthesia Med Res Ctr, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [11]Hunan Anesthesia Clin Med Care Technol Res Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [12]Hunan Clin Anesthesia Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [13]Clin Res Ctr Pain Med Hunan Prov, Dept Pain Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Background: Patients with craniofacial cancer frequently suffer from severe pain. The traditional intrathecal, oral, or intravenous analgesics could only provide insufficient pain relief with many side effects. Thus, a more effective analgesia approach is required. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of placing the catheter of an intrathecal morphine pump in the prepontine cistern for the treatment of craniofacial cancer pain. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of patients with primary or metastatic craniofacial cancer pain who received the catheter placement of an intrathecal morphine pump into the prepontine cistern in eleven medical centers from September 2019 to December 2023. Friedman test and pairwise signed-rank test were used to evaluate the difference in numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, the number of breakthrough pain episodes, dose of intrathecal morphine, and dose of systemic morphine equivalents (oral, patch, intravenous) from preoperative period to postoperative days 1, 7, and 30. P values were corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni test. Results: The study included 33 patients. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) of NRS scores at days 1, 7, and 30 postimplant were 2.0 (1.0-3.5), 2.0 (1.0-2.0), and 1.0 (1.0-2.0), respectively, which was significantly lower than that before surgery (median, 8.0; IQR, 7.0-10.0; all P < .001). Compared to baseline number/d of breakthrough pain episodes (median, 6.0; IQR, 4.5-10.0), there was a progressive decrease in the number/d of breakthrough pain episodes at day 1, day 7, and day 30 postimplant, and the median (IQR) were 1.0 (0.0-3.0), 2.0 (0.0-3.0), and 0.0 (0.0-1.2), respectively (all P < .001). Approximately 78.8% and 96.7% of patients reported pain relief >50% at days 1 and 30 postimplant, respectively. Compared with that at day 1 postimplant, the proportion of patients with a pain relief rate >75% at day 30 postimplant also increased with continued intrathecal treatment. Compared to the dose of baseline systemic morphine equivalents (median, 228 mg.d -1 ; IQR, 120-408 mg.d -1 ), the dose of systemic morphine equivalents reduced significantly from 0(0-120) mg.d -1 at day 1 postimplant ( P = .001), to 0 (0-0) mg.d -1 at days 7 and 30 postimplant (both P < .001). Few patients reported perioperative adverse events, including nausea, constipation, hypotension, urinary retention, dry mouth, headache, and sedation. No severe adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Placing the catheter tip of an intrathecal morphine pump into the prepontine cistern could effectively relieve refractory craniofacial cancer pain with an extremely low total morphine dose requirement and few adverse events. This procedure could be considered in patients with severe refractory craniofacial cancer pain.

基金:
语种:
被引次数:
WOS:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 麻醉学
最新[2025]版:
大类 | 2 区 医学
小类 | 2 区 麻醉学
JCR分区:
出版当年[2024]版:
Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
最新[2024]版:
Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY

影响因子: 最新[2024版] 最新五年平均 出版当年[2024版] 出版当年五年平均 出版前一年[2024版]

第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Pain Management & Anesthesiol, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Pain Management & Anesthesiol, Changsha 410000, Hunan, Peoples R China [10]Cent South Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Anesthesia Med Res Ctr, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [11]Hunan Anesthesia Clin Med Care Technol Res Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [12]Hunan Clin Anesthesia Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China [13]Clin Res Ctr Pain Med Hunan Prov, Dept Pain Management, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:65780 今日访问量:3 总访问量:5151 更新日期:2025-12-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号