高级检索
当前位置: 首页 > 详情页

Addition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy versus usual care alone for inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

文献详情

资源类型:
Pubmed体系:
机构: [1]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [3]School of Rehabilitation Sciences, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [4]Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [5]Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
出处:
ISSN:

摘要:
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic idiopathic inflammatory disease that includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) involves breathing pure oxygen in a pressurized environment. Existing literature suggests that HBOT may be an effective therapy for IBD, but a quantitative analysis is lacking. This study aims to estimate the adjunctive role of HBOT in treating IBD and lowering its recurrence rate.Systematic review and meta-analysis.The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Wanfang databases were systematically searched by two reviewers independently. Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.3). A random-effects model was applied due to the heterogeneity between studies.Twenty-nine out of the initially identified 606 articles were covered in this review, with a total of 2151 patients (2071 for UC and 80 for CD). No randomized data of HBOT for CD were included. Among UC patients, usual care plus HBOT were more likely to achieve a clinical response than usual care alone (risk ratio [RR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17 to 1.31; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the number of HBOT sessions had no statistically significant effect on overall efficacy (P > 0.05). The pooled data showed a lower recurrence rate in the usual care plus HBOT group (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.53; P < 0.001). The standardized mean difference in the serum tumor necrosis factor level between HBOT and non-HBOT groups was -2.13 (95% CI, -3.09 to -1.18; P < 0.001). No severe adverse events of HBOT were observed.HBOT might be an effective and safe adjunctive treatment for IBD. Further studies are required to investigate the optimal protocol of HBOT in IBD treatment.© 2022 The Authors.

基金:
语种:
PubmedID:
中科院(CAS)分区:
出版当年[2022]版:
大类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 4 区 综合性期刊
最新[2023]版:
大类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
小类 | 3 区 综合性期刊
第一作者:
第一作者机构: [1]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [3]School of Rehabilitation Sciences, West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
共同第一作者:
通讯作者:
通讯机构: [1]Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China [2]Key Laboratory of Rehabilitation Medicine in Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
推荐引用方式(GB/T 7714):
APA:
MLA:

资源点击量:54684 今日访问量:0 总访问量:4646 更新日期:2025-03-01 建议使用谷歌、火狐浏览器 常见问题

版权所有©2020 四川省肿瘤医院 技术支持:重庆聚合科技有限公司 地址:成都市人民南路四段55号